EAC - Voluntary Voting System Guidelines

Name : | Scott Hunsaker
Organization : | Hart Intercivic
Post Date : | 9/30/2005
Section Comments
Section : | 1.6.1
Page no. : | 1-9
Line no.: | 10-11
Comment : | Comment: This sentence suggests that it would be feasible to certify an "individual system component or element". Is this accurate? Recommended change: If this is the intent of the statement, then no change is recommended. If it is the intent of the Guidelines to require that a full, integrated (end-to-end) voting system be certified (i.e., ALL integrated components of the system) then a change is recommended to revise the language accordingly. Rationale: Present interpretation is that only a fully integrated system can be certified. See lines 23-25 on the same page.