|
|

 
|
| | | Name : | Hugh Gallagher | | Organization : | Election System & Management Services | | Post Date : | 9/30/2005 |
| | Section : | 6.7 | | Page no. : | | | Line no.: | | | Comment : | I have been involved with localities where elected officials, in their zeal
to cut budgets, have insisted that cheaper ballot printing costs be
obtained. I have heard, first hand, “do we really need all those ballots?”
So if convenience actually means ease of which a process is
accomplished, resulting in a savings, then yes, wireless voting can be
considered a “convenience.” If a locality has 1,000, 2000, or more
voting machines, then the ability to expeditiously and correctly prepare
voting machines for an election using wireless, can in fact result in a
long-term savings. If it means that when polls close, results are more
quickly aggregated and reported, it does in fact result in a convenience.
[Statements submitted at EAC public hearing, July 28, 2005, Pasadena] | | |
|
|