|
|

 
|
| | | Name : | James C. Johnson III | | Organization : | N/A | | Post Date : | 9/30/2005 |
| | Section : | 6.7.7 | | Page no. : | 33 | | Line no.: | | | Comment : | 6.7.7 Infrared P.33
This is totally impractical except for fixed devices that could be
precisely aligned and that remained immobile unless the standard is
referring to a light guide enclosed in an opaque enclosure. If the
optical devices communicate through the air, in order to be functional these devices must accept optical radiation from a cone of view (30 degrees for IrDA).
As a result, this requirement is meaningless as a method for securing optical wireless devices.
If this requirement is interpreted literally, these communicating
devices are no longer operating wireless, but are communicating through a shielded path that connect the devices. | | |
|
|